On Sat, 12 May 2007 17:02:28 +0100, Andy Bonwick
wrote:
>Now I know MCN are well into scaremongering but...
>
>Bennetts and NU are apparently not providing cover over the mountain
>section because its being coned off and is one way for the fortnight.
>
>I dont give a flying fuck because Im insured through Carole Nash who
>say as long as riders arent pace making or racing then theyre ok but
>if I was insured with Bennetts or NU then I might be tempted to check
>what they have to say about it.
>
>The other pov could be that if they dont actually tell me Im not
>insured and something happens then it might be a case of see you in
>court motherfuckers.
>
>Anyone insured with the above fancy a punt at finding out the truth?
Im fairly sure its nonsense, caused by MCN ringing up the insurers
and leading them on with some well chosen questions.
The mountain section will be a public road, subject to the road
traffic act. The only unusual thing about it is that the police will
have put a temporary one-way system in place. This is something the
police do all the time for special events (think about the roads
around Donington when the GP is on). As far as ones general terms
and conditions are concerned, you will still be insured. Of course,
an insurer could issue a special restriction, but that would require a
change in terms and conditions for all policyholders.
--
Champ
ZX10R | GPz750turbo | GSX-R 600 racer
My advice as your attorney is to buy a motorcycle
To email me, neal at my domain should work.