Ben wrote:
> We always seem to get the questions of whos cheapest etc, but the
> answers always seem to have the caveat of but Ive never claimed so
> dont know what thats like.
>
> It seems to me that service when you claim is possibly more important
> than the cost in the first place.
>
> So my question is... whove you actually made a claim from, and were
> they any good?
Slightly OT as this is for the car, but I was recently rear-ended and
obviously used my InsCo, First Alternative[1] to claim of her insurance.
My car has been repaired, (with Merc C-class hire car while it was
done) and I have it back. This bit all went pretty smoothly.
However, my InsCo have recently sent me my insurance renewal and have
knocked my NCD down such that the renewal premium is now 30% more than
last year. Speaking to them, this is done as a matter of course until
things are completed with the 3rd partys InsCo.
Is this true? The bit on the renewal form has the date of the
accident, the cause down as insured hit in rear and the at fault
bit marked as yes. The gits.
Anyway, Ive already found a new InsCo that are cheaper at both my real
NCD and my newly adjusted one, so I doubt that I will renew with FA
unless they can match the new quote(s). I would like my full NCD back
eventually as a matter of principal, though.
[1] The cheapest I could find, last time I renewed.
--
Chris