MOTORCYCLE

>Lozzo wrote:
>
>>Ben Blaney says...
>>> Mo wrote:
>>>
>>> >Its my belief that since the Monarchy is inherited the whole
>>> >bloody lot of them should be DNA tested and the results made
>>> >public. Then we might find out whos been fucking who.
>>>
>>> Kitty Kelleys book makes it pretty clear who Randy Andys Dad is.
>>
>>I dont have the book to hand, who did she point the finger at?
>
>Cant remember his name. Kelley details the Queens close friendship
>with whomever, then prints his photo above Prince Andrews. They are
>identical.

>On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 22:24:32 +0200, Ben Blaney
>wrote:
>
>>Lozzo wrote:
>>
>>>Ben Blaney says...
>>>> Mo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Its my belief that since the Monarchy is inherited the whole
>>>> >bloody lot of them should be DNA tested and the results made
>>>> >public. Then we might find out whos been fucking who.
>>>>
>>>> Kitty Kelleys book makes it pretty clear who Randy Andys Dad is.
>>>
>>>I dont have the book to hand, who did she point the finger at?
>>
>>Cant remember his name. Kelley details the Queens close friendship
>>with whomever, then prints his photo above Prince Andrews. They are
>>identical.
>
>Master of the Queens Racehorses. Earl of Caernarvon, iirc.

>On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 22:24:32 +0200, Ben Blaney
>wrote:
>
>>Lozzo wrote:
>>
>>>Ben Blaney says...
>>>> Mo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Its my belief that since the Monarchy is inherited the whole
>>>> >bloody lot of them should be DNA tested and the results made
>>>> >public. Then we might find out whos been fucking who.
>>>>
>>>> Kitty Kelleys book makes it pretty clear who Randy Andys Dad is.
>>>
>>>I dont have the book to hand, who did she point the finger at?
>>
>>Cant remember his name. Kelley details the Queens close friendship
>>with whomever, then prints his photo above Prince Andrews. They are
>>identical.
>
>Master of the Queens Racehorses. Earl of Caernarvon, iirc.

>Eiron wrote:
>>
>> Lozzo wrote:
>>
>> > I dont have the book to hand, who did she point the finger at?
>>
>> ITYM whom.
>
>ITYM at whom.

> ogden wrote:
>
>
>>Eiron wrote:
>>
>>>Lozzo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I dont have the book to hand, who did she point the finger at?
>>>
>>>ITYM whom.
>>
>>ITYM at whom.
>
>
>
>
> Hoisted, Eiron. Own petard.

>
> Ben Blaney wrote:
> > ogden wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Eiron wrote:
> >>
> >>>Lozzo wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I dont have the book to hand, who did she point the finger at?
> >>>
> >>>ITYM whom.
> >>
> >>ITYM at whom.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hoisted, Eiron. Own petard.
>
> That was a damp squib rather than a petard.
> How many ats do you need? You can only wear one at a time.
>

> Eiron wrote:
>>
>> Ben Blaney wrote:
>>> ogden wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Eiron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lozzo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I dont have the book to hand, who did she point the finger at?
>>>>>
>>>>> ITYM whom.
>>>>
>>>> ITYM at whom.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hoisted, Eiron. Own petard.
>>
>> That was a damp squib rather than a petard.
>> How many ats do you need? You can only wear one at a time.
>>
> Quite. And one would never one at the end of a sentence, would one?